Search for: "X Y Z Seller" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am by Michael Geist
Y is for YouTube, which received a video takedown demand from Canada Post. [read post]
13 May 2006, 6:17 pm
A nonprofit corporation Y provides services similar to those provided by X. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
Y is for YouTube, which was ordered to remove a video posted by a disgruntled law firm client. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 11:20 am
" For Balkin, when referring to the Constitution, the phrase "theory of interpretation" means, "how do we figure out what a document means, subject to the constraint that it simply must mean X, Y, and Z, where X, Y, and Z are things that I'd like it to mean. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Weiss & Weiss
  Our readers may be familiar with the standard Schedule A language, beginning at the point of x, continuing a particular number of feet to y and ending at z. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 1:20 pm
 Or maybe, in (B), Doug's Widgets sells the widgets to X, Y, and Z on credit, but then Doug's goes bankrupt.If there's legally an agreement, then presumably in (A), I can sue eBay for screwing up the sale, and in (B), Acme Manufacturing can sue X, Y, and Z for the purchase price of the widgets, right? [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:08 am by William Carleton
Inequitable compensation within an enterprise - Sally should be making as much as Bob given x, y and z - is indeed something the appropriate echelon of a company will discuss "in a quiet room. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This conclusion does, of course, mean that advertisers’ clear signals that not all items will be discounted should also be taken into account.]The dissent said this wasn’t classic bait and switch, when the seller had no intention of delivering the product advertised. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm by Adam Levitin
 In other words, in a string of transactions from X to Y to Z, if X to Y is non-usurious, but Y to Z is usurious, can X shelter in Y's usury defense? [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:18 pm
  Here’s the court’s theory:   If a  bunch of inframarginal consumers  really like products X and Y but not similar-but-slightly-different-and-cheaper product Z,  a merger between X and Y would enable the combined firm to gouge  the inframarginal consumers, regardless of the effect on the marginal folks. [read post]
This would mean, for instance, if Joe’s Retail Clothing contracted with Manufacturer X, who subcontracted with Manufacturer Y, who had Company Z sew labels onto the manufactured clothing—Joe’s Retail Clothing, Manufacturer X, and Manufacturer Y may all have independent liability to cover the unpaid or underpaid wages of Company Z’s employees if Company Z doesn’t pay them properly. [read post]
23 May 2012, 11:10 am by Imke Ratschko
If the contract in fact contains your obligation to do x y or z, you may be out of luck without more. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  DoJ didn’t pursue those claims b/c it wanted to test the waters on whether rep could say “we are studying the drug for X, Y, Z (unapproved) and our studies suggest that it works. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 3:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
6 May 2012, 3:11 pm by Lawrence Solum
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 7:53 pm
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 4:32 pm
Consumption of a good is rivalrous if consumption by one individual X diminished the opportunity of other individuals, Y, Z, etc., to consume the good. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
There are all sorts of info problems, including overproduction, reciprocity problems (seller worried about giving poor rating out of fear of getting poor rating), asymmetry, information that is out of date (right to be forgotten), etc. [read post]